Standardized scoring form for group presentations and live demonstrations.
| Category | Weight | Excellent (9–10) | Good (7–8) | Adequate (5–6) | Needs Work (1–4) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | 25% | ExcellentOriginal problem. Creative sensor + AI fusion. Clear real-world applicability. | GoodInteresting problem. Good combination of components. Practical value shown. | AdequateStandard problem. Uses required components but limited creativity. | Needs WorkCopied example project. Minimal original thinking. | /10 |
| Technical | 25% | ExcellentAI model >90% accuracy. Multiple sensors + actuators. Clean If-Else logic. Proper pin wiring. | GoodAI model >80% accuracy. Sensor + actuator work well. Logic has minor gaps. | AdequateAI model works but <80%. Basic hardware. Logic partially functional. | Needs WorkAI model not trained. Hardware not connected properly. Major logic errors. | /10 |
| Live Demo | 25% | ExcellentDemo works first try. Handles edge cases. Visual feedback on Stage. Smooth sensor→AI→actuator flow. | GoodDemo works with minor retry. Most edge cases handled. Clear data flow. | AdequateDemo partially works. Some components fail. Limited error handling. | Needs WorkDemo fails. System does not respond correctly. No integration visible. | /10 |
| Presentation | 25% | ExcellentClear 5-min structure. All members participate. Q&A handled confidently. Engaging delivery. | GoodGood structure. Most members contribute. Reasonable Q&A responses. | AdequateBasic structure. Only leader presents. Difficulty answering questions. | Needs WorkNo clear structure. Disorganized. Cannot explain project decisions. | /10 |
| Category | Weight | Raw Score (/10) | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | × 0.25 | ||
| Technical Complexity | × 0.25 | ||
| Working Demo | × 0.25 | ||
| Presentation Quality | × 0.25 | ||
| TOTAL SCORE | /10 | ||